Thursday - December 11, 2003
The Supremes are Out of Control
There is no longer any pretense that the Supreme
Court has any regard for law or reason. They have now followed the lead of both
houses of criminals, er congress, and the domestically deficient executive
branch and have outlawed political
speech.
This is the most outrageous act
perpetrated by our government since Lincoln robbed us of our right to
self-determination. The government has now made it illegal for us to criticize
it and it's clear that there is no longer anything we can do about it. Our
masters will keep us in our place.
Let's say that we did manage to oust enough
members of congress to repeal this law. It can't happen since we can't
criticize them, but let's just pretend. If we did vote the bums out, why would
the new congressmen then vote out the law? They'd have no incentive to do so,
because now they would be the entrenched power, and history has shown that the
public can only stay outraged for a limited time. After a while their anger
would subside.
Besides, it seems that
enough people think this gagging of lady liberty is a good thing. But the whole
point of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is to protect us from the
majority. Without any protection, we will perpetually be at the mercy of
whatever popular idea comes into the minds of our masters, the majority. By
gagging us, they have the abilty to retain their
overlordship.
Now, let's imagine that
somehow, someway, we enact an amendment to the Constitution that says, "The
people have the right to unfettered political speech, and this time we mean it."
What makes anyone think that the Supreme Court would notice? They no longer
consider themselves bound by the law or the Constitution. They have somehow
decided that their whims are the law of the land, regardless of the written
word, or clearly intended meaning that they at one time were imagined to
safeguard.
If somehow an Amendment to
the Constitution were created, voted in by congress and 3/4 of the states that
the Supreme Court didn't like, I would not doubt for one minute that they would
declare the Amendment to be unconstitutional. Theoretically, since it IS the
Constitution, this shouldn't be possible. Yet, they now refer to laws of other
countries to justify their decisions, they make things up, and ignore words
written very plainly that contradict their
whims.
Antonin Scalia mocked his
integrity challenged peers by asking how they see fit to permit virtual child
pornography yet not political speech. Pornography should be protected I
suppose, but it is of very little consequence in the larger scope of things.
Political speech, however, is the heart and soul of our freedom and safety.
Souter and O'Connor along with Breyer, Stevens, and Ginsburg should be impeached
and thrown out of their office. Their actions are unconscionable and they have
now proven without doubt that they are enemies of our
freedom.
Al Qaeda can only blow things
up and there is no chance that they will have much long term impact on our
safety. We must fight them and kill them wherever their hideous ideas and
culture prosper, but there is no doubt that they will in the end be
destroyed.
I wouldn't put these
traitors on our Supreme Court on the level of Al Qaeda. They are far worse. It
appears to be their intent to destroy everything that makes our freedom
possible. They pander to foreign governments and laws, ignoring our own, and
they seek to gag us from speaking freely, even truthfully, about our other
enemies in Congress. At the most important time for us to speak prior to the
time when we are able to decide on their fates, our masters have decided that we
are no longer free, we are subordinate to the continuance of their
reign.
Go Back to the Start, Do Not Collect $200 Send me your two cents
|
