Wednesday - April 11, 2007

Category Image Bush's "War Czar?"


This article says that Bush wants a "war czar" to be in charge of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

First, I despise the trend of calling political positions in the United States "czar." What a horrible name to be used in a free country.

Second. I thought we already had a commander-in-chief. Perhaps the problem with this war is that our Commander in Chief is not paying enough attention to the war.

Third. If the president wants someone to be subordinate to him and in charge of the military, we don't need to call him a czar. We have traditionally called him "general" or "admiral.

Before, I've been disappointed, but now Bush is really starting to piss me off.

end.

.

Go Back to the Start, Do Not Collect $200   Send me your two cents
|